Home
Doors
Essays2007
Essays2008
Essays2009
Essays2010
Wisdom
Gallery
Links
Bios
Contact
|
..:: Communication ::..
By
Alan Schneider
Communication is the core process
of human affairs – the one inevitable feature of all our lives. Even
when no apparent external interaction takes place, the subtle internal
events of learning and perceptual shifts still do take place, as
the consequences of intimate personal communion within ourselves.
We may perceive this as occurring among or between our personal sense of
self and the elements of our extended consciousness (which we may call
“God”, or “Angels”, or “Spirit Guides”, or “Archetypes”, perhaps), or
involving physical sensations, dreams, fantasies, ideas, or emotions.
We may not even perceive the process of internal communication at all –
simply being distracted by the rush of external events surrounding us –
or may choose to ascribe any or all of these events to any number of
external levels of manifestation, if this makes us more comfortable
with the process, but communication remains its focus regardless
of how we envision the circumstances.
The very act of a “me”
perceiving anything, even subconsciously, entails the dichotomy of a
subject – myself – interacting perceptually with an object
– the perception – however obliquely, and this is implicitly
communicative. There is no such thing as a meaningless perception or
event – everything carries information and messages for the perceiver.
This relationship only breaks down in the extreme case of the
experience (as opposed to perception) of the non-dual
consciousness associated with Buddhist Satori, knowable only in the
deepest states of meditation. That this condition has only been
experienced by a fortunate few among us may be taken for granted, and it
defies description, and therefore communication, in any case. In all
other conditions of experience, we are left with the subject-object
platform. This is even the case with the experience of pure chaos – we
as subject observers are still in contact with the experience of
something chaotic as an observed phenomenon.
One of the Primary Axioms
of Communication is that communication is inevitable and unavoidable
– considering the many forms of information transfer from sender to
receiver, including the nonverbal modalities of facial
expression, posture, gate, gestures, dress, display of social status
symbols, and, most significantly, what is left unsaid (but still
implied) in a verbal interaction – the omnipresent nature of
communication behavior is abundantly clear.
The issue remains that many
human attempts at communication are unproductive at best. This can be
attributed to several factors, including the transmission from sender to
receiver (and vise versa) of conflicting simultaneous messages (i.e. my
voice says I approve of your conduct, but my posture expresses
disapproval), the willful attempt of either sender or receiver to
practice deception, inadvertent misunderstanding of message content that
is not resolved during the interaction, and a largely subconscious
matrix of assumptions and conditioning on the part of both sender and
receiver that actively prevents understanding of the message content
from the outset. This latter deserves special attention here,
because it accounts for the great bulk of communication failure,
including those types of “failure” known as active hostility and
conflict.
We all spend our physical
existences as functional isolates, encased in our little prisons of
flesh in solitary confinement for the duration, with only the senses,
language, interaction, and culture to bridge the enormous perceptual
gaps between us. And whether we are born with this or not, we all seem
to have an apparent roster of ordained experiences that we tend to
encounter repeatedly until we have learned some deep lesson present in
their content. I prefer the term “Karma” for this supposed condition,
and this Karma includes birth into our culture of origin, our parental
genetic inputs, and familial and kinship associations. All of these
produce a unique individual within a cultural mosaic, inevitably
confronted with a series of moral challenges that will hopefully be
resolved successfully into the associated phenomenon of Dharma –
a stable, integrated condition of peaceful internal enlightenment
and external grace. In a sense, the overall human Karma could be
described as “isolation challenged with communication”, as we attempt to
reach out to each other as the social creatures that we are.
Our relative levels of
communication skills are an area that certainly could be viewed through
the lens of Karma. Many of us do not even know that the area of
“communication skills” exists at all, let alone have any idea of how to
improve our functioning in this area, or how very critical it is to our
experiences in and of the world. Forthwith, I am offering a possible
format for our effective use of communication with each other in the
following paragraphs.
When encountering another
human being in a communication context, before the first words or
glances are even exchanged, we really need to be aware of how we
are responding to the person in question. Do we feel pleased or
offended by their aspect and appearance? Are we feeling rushed or
preoccupied with something? Do we perhaps even feel threatened by the
person? And, most importantly, is there something that we want from
them as an outcome of the interaction, and, if so, what? All of
the former will affect our mindset for the communication, biasing our
expectation for the outcome, and determining our approach to the event.
Please stop and think right now for a moment how often you actually make
these basic self-assessments before entering into dialog with another.
If you do not even know where you are coming from regarding
another, how can you expect to know where you want to go with
them? Any time you can be aware of your feelings and mindset going into
even the simplest, task-oriented communication you should do so. If
nothing else, you will learn a lot about yourself in this
process, and that is the most basic element of human
communication!
Either unrealistically
positive expectations and mindsets, or unrealistically negative ones,
can represent the beginning of a communication failure. At least we can
be aware of what both of these are before initiating an
interaction, and may even be capable of forming an approximately
accurate estimate of their realism. Such estimates can almost never be
extremely accurate, because they involve so much personal
supposition and assumption on our parts, but they are a significant part
of the pre-communication scenario, and thus need to be born in mind.
Whether or not we will get what we want from an interaction, we
at least need to know what we want, have a guess at the
likelihood of success, and know how we feel about all of this
before going into the fray. The more consciously aware of these factors
we can be at the outset, the better positioned for successful
interaction we will be.
Hopefully having thus
canvassed ourselves, we can then approach the communication from the
most aware perspective possible, and begin the exchange. The first
words offered are very important. People are generally quite sensitive
to each other, regardless of how they might appear to be, and our first
words, and particularly facial expressions and voice intonation while
delivering those words, speak volumes to others. If we are feeling
negatively disposed towards the other, it is important to minimize
the impact of this in the communication if we want to experience a
favorable outcome. In such a case, the less said, looked, and
implied, the better. This applies to everything negative from traffic
tickets to nasty arguments – keep the interaction to a minimum, and bail
out as soon as the task involved is essentially “complete”, even if that
is evidently not very complete at all! In the case where we are
feeling positively disposed, it is necessary to be aware of the
possibility that the other person may not be feeling that way
about us, for any number of reasons, and thus may not respond in kind.
If a financial implication is involved, we may even be leaving ourselves
open to the possibility of interpersonal deception and manipulation as a
final outcome of an interaction with a skilled social technician, who
may feign a positive response to take advantage of us! Particularly in
relational communication environments, where the possibility of
long term involvements is significant, the best rule is to proceed
slowly and cautiously in making any assessments or commitments. There
is no test as reliable as the test of time...so take your time.
Once a mutually positive
communication environment has been established, the field is open for
exploration of possible outcomes. This is the best case scenario in
communication dynamics, whether in the casual short task situation or
the extended relational one noted above, and in all cases in between,
including those “extended relational” environments known as “gainful
employment”. In terms of positive outcome situations, the golden caveat
is mutuality – the communication must be honest enough and
effective enough to leave no lingering unresolved questions for
either or any party involved. The regularity of interaction is also key
here – at least weekly and preferably daily intervals of
sincere interaction are the best bet for producing all around
satisfaction among those involved.
The general background
condition of a culture, society, or group determines the likelihood of
successful, productive communication events occurring. Social
environments that are characterized by deception, judgementalism, open
or veiled hostility, hyper-competition, greed, or resentment will not
foster effective communication, while environments characterized by
openness, positive regard, compassion, consideration, mutual support,
love, and understanding will. It is our challenge as responsible
individuals to identify and foster the positive social conditions noted
above (and this is by no means a complete listing) to pave the way for
an enlightened human condition closer to the Heart, and centered in the
Soul.
- With Love, Alan -
(Copyright 2009, by Alan Schneider)
Return to Top
|