Home
Doors
Essays2007
Essays2008
Essays2009
Essays2010
Wisdom
Gallery
Links
Bios
Contact
|
..:: Love ::..
By
Alan Schneider
In pondering this existence, at
least two questions of the utmost significance arise – what are
we, and why are we here in that form? These essays have explored
many possible answers to these questions, as viewed through various
different spiritual, social, scientific, psychological, existential, and
political lenses of perception. The use of these perspectives
implies a starting point for this latest inquiry – we appear to be
perspective-dependent expressions of conscious perception – observation
occurs in the context of some background condition that
influences the outcome.
And this statement, in turn,
implies or suggests that there may be an ultimate background, or
perhaps background-free, condition that might serve to provide the most
authentic responses possible to the first two questions of the preceding
paragraph. My Ascension experiences have furnished considerable insight
into what this ultimate and final “background” condition at least
perceptually resembles in the field of human consciousness, and these
have been reported exhaustively in my writing. Yet, I am left with the
intuition that more needs to be expressed in the response to the first
paragraph. What, indeed, are we, in the most holistic and expansive
terms?
To begin with, since my
Ascension experiences are so central to this theme, where did
they occur? Did they occur within me, or around me, or perhaps beyond
me, with “me” considered here to be coincident with my physical
organismic boundaries? Freud would say “Yes, they occurred within you,
and should or could be classified as hallucinations, or as extreme
fantasies at the very least”. Jung would beg the question, and say “You
were experiencing the spontaneous manifestation of Archetypal symbolism,
and we do not know with certainty where the root Archetypes are
located”. The Buddha would possibly say “Since all life is suffering,
and compassion dictates that we should release suffering, we should
meditate on the desire to know what and why until we
transcend even these Dualistic questions in the blissful attainment of
Nirvana, where all suffering ceases”. Hinduism says “All life as we
experience it in the senses is Maya – Illusion – including suffering and
desire. We are all One in the Supreme Absolute Truth of Brahman”, and
advises the practices of Yoga and austerities to attain blissful Samadhi
in the reunion with that Brahman. Western Christianity simply says “God
is Love”, and the way to experience that Love is through Christ, and the
acceptance of the Sacrifice of Christ, as the Path of Salvation. And,
of course, there are multitudes of other beliefs, great and small, with
many other prescriptions for, and answers to, the riddle of this
existence.
All of the aforementioned
philosophies – and even the scientific explanations are still
ultimately philosophical in nature – express some degree of truth as
observations about life and living, even perhaps a very great degree.
And, of the greatest significance is the primary observation that
they are all occurring in the context of our manifestation as living
beings sustained by an environment, however austere (intentionally or
otherwise) that environment may be. They all amount to manipulations of
awareness, consciousness, and perspective in an attempt to expand
the lens of perception as far as possible and access the most authentic
and valid experience of the Truth possible. A clue to the answer of our
first question, then, is present in the observation that all that
we know occurs among the living, even what we presume to know about
death, the dead, and alternative states of spiritual consciousness that
seem to originate beyond life. All of these, and any other information,
is the result of living human testimony and record. Even the Christian
Bible is the result of human record keeping, all of the spiritual
miracles accounted therein notwithstanding, as is every other spiritual
document, including this one that I am currently writing.
So, what, then, are we? The
answer, put as simply as possible, is: a living, perceiving,
evolving, field of communication. I flatly defy anyone to
invalidate any of this statement – it is the summon bonum of our
existence, always has been, and always will be. The second question
asked in this essay is actually more challenging to answer: “Why are we
here in that form?” To answer that question, the location of the
field of communication just referred to must be considered.
So, if we are a field of
communication, where, specifically, is that field? Anything that
exists must be located somewhere, after all. It is tempting to
fall back on the psychodynamics of Freud and say “in the individual
brains of humanity”, but this fails to take into account the fact that
each of us is participating in many levels of collective consciousness –
cultural, social, scientific, transpersonal, and so on. So, we could
then generalize that this field is located, for the most part, on the
land masses of Earth. But, this theory discounts the ocean inhabitants,
at least some of which, like the dolphins, exhibit highly intelligent,
organized social behavior. OK, so we must say “on planet Earth
generally”. Now, if behavior implies consciousness, then all of the
behaving organisms on Earth must be considered as well, whether human or
not, not just the dolphins and dogs, but even viruses and bacteria.
And, in some way, these all contribute to our human consciousness,
because they, and their behavior, are subject to human observation, and
may generate impacts on our human condition that can be unpredictable
and far reaching. Moreover, since everything in the entire universe that
we can observe functionally exists in the field of consciousness as
thought constructs, even the hypothetical postulates must be
included in the field, including all of the Jungian archetypal symbols,
and all of the religious theories, whether in conflict with each other
or not, and whether shared among specific individuals or not.
What we are left with in the
wake of this argument is that the communication field necessarily exists
everywhere, without specifically existing in any one location
anywhere. And, since this field is ongoing through the processes of
education and acculturation, it is also functionally immortal as an
evolutionary phenomenon. One of the very interesting results of this
consideration is, for example, that if enough people believe in
their personal fields of consciousness within the social collective that
there is a God, then, for all practical intents and purposes, there
is. In fact, even if only one person perceived God, that is
enough to substantiate the concept in the entire field of
consciousness. One might argue that “God” is only an idealization, and
cannot be proven to exist in so-called objective terms, but to this I
would respond “does this mean that a perhaps lesser idealization, such
as love, also does not exist? Where is love? Can I hold it in my
hand and show it to you?” Of course, most of us have felt the heady
emotional delirium of romantic love, or the sacrifice of agape love, or
the ongoing parental love for our children, and feel that we “know” that
love is real and exists, yet I must maintain that this existence is
largely internal, and cannot be proven scientifically. So, what this
boils down to is that the single most important driver of events in the
universe (or at least in our pocket of the universe!) cannot be
objectively demonstrated, but can only be intuitively experienced at the
most subtle, personal level within the field of consciousness!
Let us return to the
Christian observation that “God Is Love” – and, by the way, this is not
solely the property of Christianity – many other spiritual belief
systems throughout history and the world also hold this as a valid
observation of the Divine Essence. What does this phrase really mean?
Essentially, we are saying that the presumably hypothetical
Source of all Creation and Manifestation is also the Universal
Embodiment of Love at the highest idealized level. What I am going to
say here is that, because we experience love at all, we also
experience the Divine Spark of the Soul within our consciousness, and
through that Soul, the Logos and God. Even the most selfish love still
implicitly recognizes the self that is the object of that love, and that
self is personally involved in the field of collective consciousness in
each human observer.
Thus, if what we are
is consciousness, and where we are is everywhere, the why
of our existence must also be universally present, just as is our
consciousness. It must be present from the most minute and hypothetical
cosmic string to the vast expanse of the cosmos itself, and beyond both
as well, if for no other reason than because we can envision what
is “beyond” as primordial chaos. The only Manifestation that can
fulfill these requirements is God, plain and simple – God must
exist to complete the equation of existence. And if God is the
source of all Creation, we come at last to the question of why.
Why should there be a Creation at all? Why should anything exist? If
God is omnipotent, why should this Being, who could just as well have
continued to reside in solitude, have even bothered to Create anything?
Because the supreme experience of consciousness on every level from the
local, personal, and physical to the Universal and Divine is Love.
Love is the essence of all conscious manifestation. At the instant of
Self Realization, God simply poured forth all manifestation in an
expression of Love on every conceivable level that continues to this
day, and will continue throughout all time to come forever. This
is the meaning of “God Is Love” – the infinite dance of existence. This
is the why of our existence.
In Hindu and Yogic terms, the
manifestation of this driver of Creation is the Kundalini Energy. This
is presumed to exist in a seed form in the Root Chakra, Muladhara, in a
conceptual “packet” at the base of the spine, very near the anus. This
parcel of Divine consciousness is generally considered to be largely
dormant until the onset of puberty, “awakening” at that time with the
onset of the hormonal secretions associated with the maturation of the
gonads. But consider this – if all that has been suggested here is
substantially valid, and all consciousness is created from Love, and
quite literally is Love, then any from of consciousness must be
an expression of that Love at any physical age. Perception
itself is an act of Love. There cannot be anything other than
Love in the field of consciousness. Therefore, I maintain that the
Kundalini is always manifest and active at the root of
consciousness, as our guarantee that, no matter how involved in the
Illusion of Maya we become, there will always be a force at work
relentlessly pulling us toward the Soul, Divine Love, and God
Realization, from the point of conception onward.
So it is that the whole dance of manifestation on the Physical, material
Plane is also the dance of Creation on the highest Spiritual Plane – the
Logoic Plane – and any distinction we perceive between the two, or among
any of the intermediate levels of experience, is a simple function of
personal perspective in experiencing what amounts to One Universal
Condition that is omnipresent and eternal. I once met a little Buddha
working behind the counter in a Subway restaurant who looked at me
radiantly and said “Life is all a matter of perspective”. I invite you
to expand yours!
- With Love, Alan -
(Copyright 2009, by Alan Schneider)
Return to Top
|